^^^^^^ I agree. But at this point in time, the more of these cars come into the market, the better it is for everyone, including Fisker.
-- Fab.
-- Fab.
Maybe, but the interior fittings and styling looks pretty good for a car of this price range. I guess the thinking is that you don't really look at the outside of your own car very much anyway, so they spent their time and money on the inside of the car.AnOutsider said:Agreed, it's a great first step. I do think the bland styling may do it a disservice though. People already see EVs as quaint appliances.
I have seen one in person. They should have called it The COMA. On the other hand, an EV does not need to be glamorous to be useful, so someone would buy it an use it.Saw this on ebay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CODA...6297948?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item4ac1a380dc
I never realized how unfinished the CODA looks. Is there a cover missing under the front bonnet? I wonder if CODA has the same cold weather range issues as the Model S due to the batteries being built into the floor the vehicle. We may never find out as they have only sold very few of these cars and chances are none of these owners live in cold weather climates. Does anyone know anyone who has bought one of these?
Most other EVs do have a 6.6KW OBC which is why Level II charging points are typically rated at 30 AMPS. Fisker just went with a super-anemic OBC for reasons no one has been able to articulate.Looking at the spec sheet the car has some nicely spec'd components; in particular the 6.6kw charger. This should be a standard feature on all EV's.
The 2 star crash rating was probably the dagger for CODA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEzux0rTgJA
After watching the video it is pretty scary to see that the driver is basically launched into the steering column after impact. It seems as if the seatbelt tensioners did not work properly?