Indeed. That's the virtual equivalent of, say, crash-testing a fuel storage tank, then leaving it full of fuel in the parking lot for three weeks right next to a pile of oily rags.Dutch said:This news is such nonsense. The car was crash-tested (sideways) and then left for three weeks without checking the battery, after which it ignited. ...
Also note that NHTSA tried to replicate the event by crash testing another Volt in the same way and letting it sit for 3 weeks with a fully charged battery, and absolutely nothing happened.Dutch said:This news is such nonsense. The car was crash-tested (sideways) and then left for three weeks without checking the battery, after which it ignited.
I agree, the news is nonsense; but there will be some kind of PR fall out.Fabulist said:Also note that NHTSA tried to replicate the event by crash testing another Volt in the same way and letting it sit for 3 weeks with a fully charged battery, and absolutely nothing happened.Dutch said:This news is such nonsense. The car was crash-tested (sideways) and then left for three weeks without checking the battery, after which it ignited.
By comparison, out of 1500 747s built since the aircraft went into production, 49 were lost to accidents. GM has already sold 15000 Volts and 1 has had an unexplained fire. Does Boeing need to convince people all over the world that the 747 is a safe plane?
-- Fab.
Here is the list. Foreign crashes, especially cargo flights, generally don't get a great deal of coverage in the US, which is why the number seems on the high side. The most recent accident occurred on July 28, 2011 for example, but got almost no news coverage in the US.BillyO said:Are you sure 3 out of every 100, 747s have been lost to accidents? That seems really high.