Didn't YOU give them money?brian said:I can't imagine anyone being dumb enough to give them more money at this point. For that matter I'm not sure how anyone could have been dumb enough to have given them money in the first place.
-Brian
Hell no. I gave them my $111,000 for the car but there was no way I was going to invest in the company.marcus said:Didn't YOU give them money?
You also paid your taxes.brian said:Hell no. I gave them my $111,000 for the car but there was no way I was going to invest in the company.marcus said:Didn't YOU give them money?
-Brian
I never thought of Kleiner Perkins as being dumb money.brian said:I can't imagine anyone being dumb enough to give them more money at this point. For that matter I'm not sure how anyone could have been dumb enough to have given them money in the first place.
-Brian
Nor did most people. That's how they got so many other investors to follow them. Lots of big financial names in the last decade have made really, really dumb moves, and look what happened to them, so just because a respected company is behind a dumb investment doesn't mean the investment is any less dumb.dennis said:I never thought of Kleiner Perkins as being dumb money.
I am sure Fisker will work out at the end.marcus said:You also paid your taxes.brian said:Hell no. I gave them my $111,000 for the car but there was no way I was going to invest in the company.marcus said:Didn't YOU give them money?
-Brian
Unfortunately, I think there are too few of us buying cars. Now it's gambling time! Investors (including taxpayers) are going to have to pay to see another card.
Brian, I am willing to bet you $100 that Fisker gets their next round of funding. That's only an additional 0.1% investment over the cost of the car. Are you game?brian said:Nor did most people. That's how they got so many other investors to follow them. Lots of big financial names in the last decade have made really, really dumb moves, and look what happened to them, so just because a respected company is behind a dumb investment doesn't mean the investment is any less dumb.dennis said:I never thought of Kleiner Perkins as being dumb money.
-Brian
KP was paid for raising the money.dennis said:I never thought of Kleiner Perkins as being dumb money.brian said:I can't imagine anyone being dumb enough to give them more money at this point. For that matter I'm not sure how anyone could have been dumb enough to have given them money in the first place.
-Brian
They also have a big chunk of their own money invested in the company, far more than any fees they may have collected and are exposed to the risk along with the other investors.BillyO said:KP was paid for raising the money.dennis said:I never thought of Kleiner Perkins as being dumb money.brian said:I can't imagine anyone being dumb enough to give them more money at this point. For that matter I'm not sure how anyone could have been dumb enough to have given them money in the first place.
-Brian
BillyO
We also know why they tried to pretend it was the EPA's fault that the car wasn't shipping. If they had approved the car back in April 2011, it still wouldn't have been ready.Dutch said:I think we've just found the reason why the Karma was brought to market even if not all the teething problems were solved: the loan-contract stipulated certain goals for the Karma-program to be met, and one of them was probably producing a certain number of cars by a certain date.
[hr]brian said:Hehe... I ask myself that question every time the car malfunctions. The answer is YES. They may very well go out of business by the end of the year, but for the money I'm still happy I got this car even if it turns into a giant paperweight.BillyO said:Are you happy you gave them your money?
-Brian[hr]
Just saw this: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gm3Y0fC4OaKwSkk3pauOonAmQhMA?docId=bffaf722c7534b8187c5756f40143ab8
Seems to be the most detailed report on the situation so far.
-Brian
Hamit Yasarturk said:brian said:Hehe... I ask myself that question every time the car malfunctions. The answer is YES. They may very well go out of business by the end of the year, but for the money I'm still happy I got this car even if it turns into a giant paperweight.BillyO said:Are you happy you gave them your money?
-Brian[hr]
Just saw this: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gm3Y0fC4OaKwSkk3pauOonAmQhMA?docId=bffaf722c7534b8187c5756f40143ab8
Seems to be the most detailed report on the situation
lool at bright side, car is absolutly gorgeous. when we have seen a car last time stir up emotions.
[hr]
you absoletly right.AnOutsider said:We also know why they tried to pretend it was the EPA's fault that the car wasn't shipping. If they had approved the car back in April 2011, it still wouldn't have been ready.Dutch said:I think we've just found the reason why the Karma was brought to market even if not all the teething problems were solved: the loan-contract stipulated certain goals for the Karma-program to be met, and one of them was probably producing a certain number of cars by a certain date.