RE: Everyone just needs to see the Karma stabalized (software etc) and Funding worked out
I am looking at the Fisker Karma, they go from zero to a car in four years. That is mighty impressive. But some said they are two years too late. So late they should not be in business? Fisker has probably over promised. Better late than never. Look at the car, how nicely it drives, almost no trip to gas station for some, drives clean and it is stunning.
Karma is very much like a computer. It is not an ICE car, put in your key, turn and go. It need to do a complete boot up first. Impatient driver pressing multiple function before it boots up will confuse the computer. Should it happen that way? Probably not. Fisker delivered a working car, the fine tuning will be done...beauty of software. A lot of high-tech companies will ship their hardware to the field, deploy, gain field experience and improve. You all have got a great car. What is stopped is Nina which has nothing to do with Karma. Wouldn't you do the same thing if the business plan involving DOE changed? Take a breather and reevaluate.
Fisker designs too beautiful a car to go out of business. If you have the right product, you have no problem with demand. I have every confidence that Fisker will survive and flourish.
There is not enough celebration of an American success. A little bit of setback or roadblock, non-doers come out in full force trashing and FUDding. Where has the American innovation and risk taking gone to? Is America going to take a back seat to the emerging countries?Dutch said:I have to say I'm seeing a lot of pessimism on this forum and not much optimism.ejo3rd said:plugitin,
You seem to be very optimistic, which is great. Is there something you can share with us to boost our optimism or is it just your nature?
There was pessimism that Fisker wouldn't make it when the company was launched 4 years ago, and they made it. There was pessimism that they wouldn't complete the car and they did. There was pessimism they wouldn't be able to produce it in significant numbers and they are doing right that.
And now there is pessimism that they can't fix the electronic issues troubling the cars that have already been delivered, even though they are working hard on fixing them and seem to be making progress. Why not believe that they can solve them? There is pessimism the company won't survive because the Nina-program has been put on hold because they are renegotiating the loan-conditions, even though the Karma is fully funded. Why not believe that they can live on the Karma for now, that they can re-negotiate, that they can find more private funds, that they can go public...
I am looking at the Fisker Karma, they go from zero to a car in four years. That is mighty impressive. But some said they are two years too late. So late they should not be in business? Fisker has probably over promised. Better late than never. Look at the car, how nicely it drives, almost no trip to gas station for some, drives clean and it is stunning.
Karma is very much like a computer. It is not an ICE car, put in your key, turn and go. It need to do a complete boot up first. Impatient driver pressing multiple function before it boots up will confuse the computer. Should it happen that way? Probably not. Fisker delivered a working car, the fine tuning will be done...beauty of software. A lot of high-tech companies will ship their hardware to the field, deploy, gain field experience and improve. You all have got a great car. What is stopped is Nina which has nothing to do with Karma. Wouldn't you do the same thing if the business plan involving DOE changed? Take a breather and reevaluate.
Fisker designs too beautiful a car to go out of business. If you have the right product, you have no problem with demand. I have every confidence that Fisker will survive and flourish.